<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberal Scotland &#187; Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalscotland.com/category/elections/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalscotland.com</link>
	<description>Defining Liberalism in Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TV Debates</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalscotland.com/2009/elections/tv-debates</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalscotland.com/2009/elections/tv-debates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>niallrowantree</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalscotland.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was inevitable that Alex Salmond would give us a hue and cry about the televised leaders&#8217; debates and the absence of the SNP&#8217;s invitation.
I think I agree with the common sentiment that the SNP or Plaid Cymru don&#8217;t have a place in the debates, Alex Salmond isn&#8217;t even standing for Westminster in the next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was inevitable that Alex Salmond would give us a hue and cry about the televised leaders&#8217; debates and the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6964953.ece" target="_blank">absence of the SNP&#8217;s invitation</a>.</p>
<p>I think I agree with the common sentiment that the SNP or Plaid Cymru don&#8217;t have a place in the debates, Alex Salmond isn&#8217;t even standing for Westminster in the next General Election.  Although the fuss was inevitable it does raise a slight issue with the debates.  What are the criteria for inclusion?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read anything that outlines how this was agreed between the parties and the broadcasters.  Have they set an arbitrary share of the national vote criteria?  If they have set one &#8211; what is it?  Is it a condition that a party needs to be standing in all parts of the United Kingdom?  Was consideration given to a debate between other ministers and shadow ministers to better reflect the parliamentary nature of our democracy?</p>
<p>There are still a lot of issues that need to be ironed out but I dont think <a href="http://www.snp.org/node/15750" target="_blank">this </a>from the SNP:</p>
<p>“The SNP are seeking to have a substantial influence at Westminster by electing a block of 20 or more MPs, with obvious UK-wide political implications – not least given the perfectly possible outcome of a hung parliament and tight arithmetic.&#8221;</p>
<p>has sufficient merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalscotland.com/2009/elections/tv-debates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
